Skip to main content
Exit

Bibliography

Bibliographies

  1. Peck, Russell A. Chaucer’s Romaunt of the Rose and Boece, Treatise on the Astrolabe, Equatorie of the Planetis, Lost Works and Chaucerian Apocrypha: An Annotated Bibliography 1900–1985 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988). Pp. 308–09, 317–21, 325–26.
  2. Robbins, Rossell Hope. “The Chaucerian Apocrypha.” In A Manual of the Writings in Middle English, ed. Albert E. Hartung (New Haven: Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1974). Volume IV, chapter XI, pp. 1094–97, 1302–05.

Editions

  1. Daly, Vincent, ed. A Critical Edition of The Isle of Ladies. The Renaissance Imagination: Important Literary and Theatrical Texts from the Late Middle Ages through the Seventeenth Century. Volume 28 (New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1987). [Typescript of Harvard University Ph.D. thesis, 1977.]
  2. Jenkins, Anthony, ed. The Isle of Ladies or the Ile of Pleasaunce. Garland Medieval Texts, Number 2 (New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1980).
  3. Pearsall, D. A., ed. The Floure and the Leafe and The Assembly of Ladies. Nelson’s Medieval and Renaissance Library (London and Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson, 1962; reprinted Manchester: Manchester University Press, Old and Middle English Texts Series, 1980).
  4. Skeat, W. W., ed. Chaucerian and Other Pieces. Volume VII of The Works of Chaucer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1897). [Editions of FL and AL.]

Critical Studies

  1. Barratt, Alexandra A. T. “‘The Flower and the Leaf’ and ‘The Assembly of Ladies’: Is There a (Sexual) Difference?” Philological Quarterly 66 (1987), 1–24.
  2. Green, Richard Firth. Poets and Princepleasers: Literature and the English Court in the Late Middle Ages (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1980). [See especially chapter 4, “The Court of Cupid.”]
  3. Hammond, Eleanor Prescott, ed. English Verse between Chaucer and Surrey (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1927). [Texts and excellent commentary. Invaluable background.]
  4. Harrington, David V. “The Function of Allegory in The Flower and the Leaf.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 71 (1970), 244–53.
  5. Lewis, C. S. The Allegory of Love (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936). [See especially pp. 247–49.]
  6. Marsh, G. L. “Sources and Analogues of The Flower and the Leaf.” Modern Philology 4 (1906–7), 121–68, 281–328.
  7. McMillan, Ann. “‘Fayre Sisters Al’: The Flower and the Leafe and The Assembly of Ladies.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 1 (1982), 27–42.
  8. Pearsall, Derek. “The English Chaucerians.” In Chaucer and Chaucerians: Critical Studies in Middle English Literature, ed. D. S. Brewer. (London and Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson, 1966), pp. 201–39. [See especially 225–30.]
  9. Seaton, Ethel. Sir Richard Roos: Lancastrian Poet (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1961). [Valuable literary and social background, especially in chapters I and II; the authorship attributions (all three poems are ascribed to Roos) are not to be taken seriously.]
  10. Stephens, John. “The Questioning of Love in the Assembly of Ladies.” Review of English Studies ns 24 (1973), 129–40.
  11. Stevens, John. Music and Poetry in the Early Tudor Court (London: Methuen, 1961). [See especially chapter 9, “The Game of Love,” pp. 154–202 (AL, 179–80; FL, 180–82).]